"B.Y.U. Studies", Number 3 - Spring 1977 Page 259
A Translation and Commentary of the Joseph Smith Hypocephalus
by Michael Dennis Rhodes *
My purpose in writing this paper has not been to "try to prove" that the Prophet Joseph's interpretation of the hypocephalus is correct; that proof can come only from God, and each individual must find it for himself. Rather, it has
been my aim to present a translation and commentary of the hypocephalus known as Facsimile 2 of the Pearl of Great Price, drawing upon our current knowledge of Egyptian language, culture, and religion. Surprisingly (at least to some), in a number of
instances Joseph Smith's interpretation accords with modern Egyptology's. In other cases, however, there is definite disagreement. I have not tried to disguise or pass over these differences; I have sought merely to present them as I see them. What
significance can be attached to them, each must decide for himself.
When dealing with things Egyptian, one must constantly be on guard against making absolute statements. Our knowledge of Egyptian civilization is woefully small. As Alan Gardiner has stated, "It must never be forgotten that we are dealing
with a civilization thousands of years old and one of which only tiny remnants have survived. What is proudly advertised as Egyptian history is merely a collection of rags and tatters." 1 At best we can make "educated" guesses which
are in constant need of revision and which often, when viewed in the light of subsequent knowledge, seem most ludicrous. This paper then is not meant to be a definitive and final word on the Joseph Smith Hypocephalus, but rather, in Gardiner's words,
" A target for others to tilt at."
Hypocephalus is the name given to a small disk-shaped object made of papyrus, stuccoed linen, bronze, wood, or clay, which the Egyptians placed under the head of their deceased (hence the name hypocephalus,
literally, "under the head"). The purpose of the hypocephalus was to envelope the head and body in flames or radiance, thus making the deceased divine. 2 The hypocephalus itself symbolized the eye of Re or Horus,
3 i.e., the sun, and the scenes portrayed on it relate to the resurrection or life after death, which idea is more particularly symbolized by the course of the sun. The upper portion of the hypocephalus represented the day sky,
and the lower portion (the part with the cow) the night sky.
Hypocephali first appeared during the Saite Dynasty (663-525 B.C.) and their use continued down at least to the Christian era. 4 It is in the Saite recension of
the Book of the Dead, chapter 162, that directions for the construction and use of the hypocephalus are given. The section to which this chapter belongs (162-165) is found only in the late Saite
version and contains many strange words and concepts. Eduard Naville considers these chapters to be of foreign origin, or at least influenced by sources outside
Egypt
. 5 E.A. Wallis Budge suggests that the influence is in part Nubian. 6
Since the meaning of the hypocephalus is intimately connected with chapter 162 of the Book of the Dead, I will now give a translation of the whole of that chapter as is found in Richard Lepsius' Todtenbuch.
7
Chapter 162
Title: A spell for causing flame to occur under the head of a glorified being.
1. To be recited: Greetings to you, mighty Par 8 of the
lofty Double plumes, possessor of the White crown [of
Upper Egypt
], equipped with the flail. You are Lord of the Phallus. 9 You rise consistently,
261
2. shining forth
and never ceasing to rise. You are a master of forms, who has numerous appearances. You hide yourself from your children 10 in [or with] the Udjat-eye 11. You are the strong roarer in the midst
of the Assembly 12 of the Gods. You are a
3. powerful
runner, swift of stride. 13 You are a strong god who comes to the one that summons him, [and who comes] to the one that laments [his] misery
4. caused by
need [or pestilence]. Come then to my call, [for] I am Ihet. 14 Your name 15 is in my mouth, [and] I will say it: he of Hghghr 16 is your
5. name, >Iri-ikrs-ing-rbt 17 is your name, Srp.t-miw-sriw 18 is your name, Hrst 19 is your name. I have praised your name. I am Ihet. Hear my voice this
6. day. You
placed a flame under Re's head, and behold, he is in the divine Netherworld in
Heliopolis
. 20 You caused him to become like those upon the earth. 21 He is your soul, do not forget him. Come to the
7. Osiris, Efonakh, justified, [and] cause a flame to occur under his head. Truly he is the soul of the Great Body 22 which rests in
Heliopolis
. 3hw-hpr-sr 23 is his name, Br-kt-tw 24 is his name. Come indeed and
8. cause him
to become like one of your followers, [for] this one, he belongs to you. To be recited over a figure of Ihet which is made of fine gold and placed around the neck of the
9. glorified
being and also put in writing upon new papyrus [and] placed under his head. [If this is done,] there will be a multitude of flames all around him as [it is] with those upon the earth. The Eye of Ihet [i.e., the
hypocephalus] is a very great protection for her son, Re, when he sets.
10. His throne shall be encircled by a zealous [?] 25 army. He shall be made divine 26 in the Necropolis [and] he shall not be
turned back from any door of
11. the Netherworld
successfully. Then shall you say [after] you have placed this goddess around the neck of the glorified being, "O most hidden one who is in heaven, watch over the body of your son, [and] preserve him in the Necropolis.
12. This is a great and secret book. Do not allow
anyone's eyes to see it, [for] that would be an abomination. He who knows it [i.e., the book] and keeps it secret, he will continue to exist.
13. The name of this book is: Mistress of the
Secret
Temple
. The End.
Hypocephali are found in several museums in
Europe
, 27 but except for the Joseph Smith Hypocephalus, none seem to have found their way to
America
. The largest single collection of hypocephali is in the
British
Museum
, and three pieces of that collection are very closely related to the Joseph Smith Hypocephalus both in layout and text. 28 Comparing these with Facsimile 2 from the Pearl of Great Price has made it possible to reconstruct
the original text of the Joseph Smith Hypocephalus with only a few questionable readings.
Since the story of the finding of the hypocephalus and the other scrolls and how they eventually came into the possession of Joseph Smith is given elsewhere. 29 I will touch on it only briefly. Around the year 1818, Antonio Label was employed
by Bernadino Drovetti, French Consul-General in
Egypt
at the time, to find antiquities in
Thebes
. While digging in the area of Gurneh, he discovered a large shaft at the bottom of which he found some 400 mummies. He removed eleven of them, but died before he was able to remove any of the others. Of these eleven,
seven were retained by Drovetti, but the remaining four were willed to Label's nephew, Michael Chandler, and were shipped to him in
America
. When
Chandler
received the mummies, he unwrapped them and found several papyri with them among which was the hypocephalus we are now considering. In 1835
Chandler
sold the mummies and the papyri to the Church, and Joseph Smith then began to translate and publish them in the Millennial Star. Thus it would seem from the meager evidence we have, that the Joseph Smith Hypocephalus came from a tomb located in the Gurneh area of
Thebes
. From the text of the hypocephalus itself, it seems that the owner's name was Sheshonk. 30
When perusing Facsimile 2, one is immediately struck by the contrast between most of the hieroglyphic signs, which are readily recognizable, and the signs of the right third of the figure on the outer edge as well as the outer portions of the
sections numbered 12-15. On closer examination, these prove to be hieratic and inverted (that is, upside down to the rest of the text). And, most surprising of all, these hieratic are recognizable as a fairly faithfully rendered copy of lines 2, 3,
and 4 of the Church papyrus XI, which contains a portion of the Sensen papyrus or Book of Breathings. Especially clear is the actual word, snsn, in section 14, and part of the name of the
possessor of the papyrus, (t3y-)hhy.t, repeated twice. Why this was done I am not sure. I can only postulate that these portions of the hypocephalus were damaged (a common enough occurrence
because of the extremely fragile condition of these documents), and someone (the printer, one of the Prophet's associates, or Joseph Smith himself) copied these characters off the Sensen papyrus so that the facsimile would
look complete. In support of the view is an ink drawing of Facsimile 2 in the Church Historian's Office which shows blanks in these sections.
Following is a reconstructed hieroglyphic transcription of the text of the Joseph Smith Hypocephalus. As is the normal practice, it will read from left to right rather than from right to left as is found in the original text.
Facsimile 2 - Hieroglyphic Transcription
I propose the following translation of the reconstructed text of Facsimile 2. I have tried to avoid giving too literal a translation, but have sought rather to convey the meaning of that original as I understand it. Whenever
a question arose, my reason for translating a given word or passage as I did are given in the footnotes. Also included for comparison are translations of the three hypocephali from the
British
Museum
which show close relationship with the Joseph Smith Hypocephalus.
JOSEPH SMITH HYPOCEPHALUS
Edge: I am Djabty 31 in the House of the Benben in
Heliopolis
, 32 so exalted and glorious. 33 [I am] a copulating bull without equal. 34 [I am] that 35 Mighty God 36 in the House of the Benben in
Heliopolis
. . . that Mighty God . . .
Left Middle: O God of the Sleeping Ones 37 from the time of the Creation. 38 O Mighty God, Lord of Heaven and Earth, the Netherworld and his Great Waters, 39 grant that the soul of Osiris
40 Sheshonk, 41 may live.
Bottom: May this tomb never be desecrated, 42 and may this soul and its possessor never be desecrated in the Netherworld.
Upper Left: You shall be as that God, the Busirian. 43
To the Left of the Standing Two-headed God: The name 44 of this Mighty God.
BRITISH MUSEUM HYPOCEPHALUS
Edge: O Djabty in the House of the Benben in
Heliopolis
, so high. A copulating bull. . .[may you cause fire to occur under] his head. As for this Mighty God, may he cause the soul of the Osiris, Bukheben, justified to live.
Right Middle: O Mighty God, who lives, breathes and journeys on the water, and whose word Re enters to hear.
Left Middle: O August God, O Mighty God, who lives in Heaven.[You are] one who is jealous of his power, a Living One to Whom is given life, duration and dominion forever.
BRITISH MUSEUM HYPOCEPHALUS 37909
Edge: O Djabty in the House of the Benben, so high and glorious. O copulating bull, Mighty God in . . . whose majesty is distinguished. May you grant that the soul of the Osiris, Takhered-Khons, justified, live, who is the daughter of Tanu-en-Baste, most justified.
Top Half by Standing Figure: I am known 45 and I know. 46
Top Half, Left Upper Section: You are 47 the eight rams, you have lived.
Bottom Half: Tomb of the Water-room [?] 48. mrh.t-chamber. 49
BRITISH MUSEUM HYPOCEPHALUS 8445c
Edge: O shrine 50 in the House of the Benben, so high and glorious. O copulating bull, Mighty God, Living One who is over the Gods in . . .[several words are broken off here]. . . to the Osiris, Har, justified. May you 51 cause flame to occur under his head, [for] he is one of your followers. 52
Bottom: Trespassed tomb of the chapel of water [?]. 53
Top: You are the eight rams of your gods [?]. 54
FACSIMILE 2 BY THE NUMBERS
The interpretation of illustrations is probably the most difficult part of understanding Egyptian text. These illustrations were not included merely for decoration; they were always used to supplement and clarify the text. Their symbolic
meaning, however, is often for us quite obscure and even baffling. A given symbol can have many different meanings, and trying to decide which one the author of the text was trying to convey is at times nearly impossible. For example, the Udjat-eye can represent healing, but also completion, light, totality, protection, glory, and even riches. 55 Add to this the fact that in many instances we have no idea what some symbols mean, and one can appreciate the
magnitude of the problem now before us. Samuel Birch, after struggling to explain the meaning of several of the illustrations found on the hypocephali he was studying, finally admitted, "The esoteric meaning of scenes is unknown." 56
Following is an interpretation of the illustrations on the Joseph Smith Hypocephalus:
1. A seated deity with two (or in most hypocephali, four) 57 ram's heads. He holds in his hand the symbols of life (cnh), dominion (w3s) and stability (dd). On either side of the god are
two cynocephalic apes (nos. 22 and 23) with horned moondisks on their heads, in an attitude of adoration. 58 There are also two serpents, one either side of the seated deity. 59
This seated god represents the creator god, Khnum. 60 When thus depicted with four heads, Khnum united within himself the attributes of the gods Re (the sun), Shu
(light), Geb (the earth), and Osiris (the afterworld), and he was considered to be type of the primeval creative force, Sf.t-h3.t. 61 This four-headed version of Khnum
was worshiped at Mendes, Egyptian B3-nd-Dd.t, "The Ram [or Ba] of the Lord of Djedet," and he was called the ram with four on one neck. 62
The basic ideas apparently represented by central figures on the hypocephalus focus on the Creator-God, his powers in life, dominion, and stability. In much the same vein, Joseph Smith's comments on these characters speak of "the first
creation," God's "residence," "government," and "measurement of time." The ideas in the two cases strike parallels if we admit life and residence as closely related concepts, dominion and government as functional
equivalents, and measurements of time as presupposing some form of stability.
The cynocephalic apes can represent Thoth and the moon, 63 but due to their curious habit of watching the rising of sun, the apes were also thought to be spirits of the dawn who were
worshiping the sun at its rising. 64 For this reason, they are often found in connection with the sun. Also, besides these solar and lunar associations, apes are found in connection with stars and constellations. 65 Exactly what they represent here
is not clear, but Joseph Smith's explanation that the two apes represent stars is not unreasonable. A scene quite similar to this is found on the obverse of the famous Metternich Stela, where
eight apes are seen worshiping a seated god with four rams' heads. The god himself is encircled in a sun disk. To the left stands the Ibis-headed god, Thoth, with whom, as before mentioned, the
apes are often found associated. 66
The meaning of the two snakes is harder to arrive at. Snakes were an object of both fear and reverence for the Egyptians. On the one hand, they were considered to be "earth demons" because of their close association with the ground,
and they were avoided as much as possible. But along with this belief, was the idea that snakes possessed a protective power, and for this reason they were used as amulets for the protection of houses, temples, and tombs. 67 It is probably in this
latter sense that they are used here.
2. A two-headed deity wearing the double-plumed crown of Amen, with Ram's horns mounted on it. On his shoulders are jackal
heads, and he is holding the jackal standard of Wepwawet. To his right is an altar with offerings on and around it. In most hypocephali, he is holding the ankh, or symbol of life, in his
right hand. Also to his right a line of hieroglyphics reading: "The name of this Mighty God."
P.J. de Horrack considers this to be Amen-Re; the two heads illustrating the hidden and mysterious power of Amen combined with the visible and luminous power of Re. 68 William Petrie agrees that it is Amen-Re, but
sees the two heads as representing the rising and setting sun. 69 That the deity is a form of Amen is clear from the fact that he is wearing the double plume crown mentioned in chapter 162 of the Book of the Dead, but why he has jackals' heads on his
shoulders and is holding a jackal standard is not so evident. The jackal is generally is used as a symbol of Anubis and Wepwawet, both funerary gods. Anubis being
specifically the god assigned to guide the dead through the afterworld to the throne of Osiris. Perhaps due to the funerary character of the hypocephalus, it was thought that Amen should also carry emblems indicative of
his power over that realm as well.
Again, we can compare here the significance ascribed to these characters by Joseph Smith. Where the hypocephalus depicts the two-headed deity holding the symbol of life or power over death, Joseph mentions "holding the key of power."
Where an altar is shown, Joseph identifies the principle of "sacrifice upon an altar" as revealed by God to Abraham. A hidden power seems to be associated with the name of the two-headed God, who probably serves as a guide for the dead
bring them into the presence of God. This might concur with Joseph's explanation that this figure "stands next to Kolob," as a guide surely must do if the is going to be able to lead the dead to God.
3. Hawk-headed Re with the sun disk on his head, seated on the solar bark. On either side of him is an Udjat-eye. In his hand he holds the w3s-sceptre, symbol of dominion, 70 and in front of him is an altar with a
lotus blossom on it.
Re seated in his bark represent the sun in its daily journey across the sky and symbolizes resurrection and rebirth, since the sun was thought to die and be reborn each day. The lotus on the altar in front of him is also symbolic of rebirth and the rising sun. 71 The Udjat-eye was symbolic of light and protection (among other things), 72 and is thus not out of place in
this context.
Here again certain similarities may be detected in Joseph Smith's explanations. Where we may identify a royally seated god holding the sceptre of dominion, Joseph describes a god sitting on his throne clothed with
power and authority. The sun disk on the god's head and the Udjat-eye, symbolic of light and protection, somewhat track in meaning Joseph's mention of "a crown of eternal light . . . also the grand key-words of the
holy priesthood." No explicit mention of resurrection imagery is made by Joseph Smith here or elsewhere in his explanations, but his entire discussion assumes an immortal perspective.
4. A mummiform hawk with outspread wings, seated upon a boat. Represents either Horus-Soped or Sokar, both hawk gods, which are symbolized by a mummiform hawk. 73 De Horrack suggests that it symbolizes the resurrection of the body or soul, 74 but this does not seem to be very convincing to me. One outstanding feature of this figure is its
outspread wings, which are not normally found in representations of these two gods. Some connection with Horus, the personification of the sky, seems clear. 75 The association with Sokar, the
ancient god of
Memphis
, is even more interesting. In the festival of Sokar, which was celebrated in many parts of
Egypt
, a procession was held in which the high priest would place the Sokar-boat on a sledge and pull it around the sanctuary. This procession was symbolic of the revolution of the sun and other celestial bodies. 76
Unfortunately, no texts have come down to us explaining this symbolism in more detail.
Joseph Smith sees here symbolism for the expanse or firmament of the heavens, which concept, as stated above, the Egyptians often represented by a hawk god (especially Horus). Also, Joseph's explanation that this
figure represents the revolutions of Kolob, and Oliblish agrees favorably with what we know of the symbolism of the Sokar-boat in the festival of Sokar
at
Memphis
.
5. A cow wearing a sun disk and double plumes with a menit-necklace (symbol of Hathor, Ihet, etc.). 77 This is the cow Ihet,
mentioned in chapter 162 of the Book of the Dead, which should be drawn on a piece of new papyrus. 78 This picture of cow is common to almost all hypocephali. Ihet is a from of Hathor, the personification of the power of nature. 79 She is also connected with Mehweret (Greek Methyr), another cow goddess who symbolized the sky. 80 The name Mehweret (mh-wr.t) means, "Great fullness,"i.e., the primeval waters from which Re first arose. Especially instructive is a section of chapter 17 from the Book of
the Dead: 81
I have seen this Re who was born yesterday from the buttocks of Mehweret. 82 [If] he prospers, I prosper. [If] I prosper, he prospers.
What is this? This is the Primeval Waters of heaven. [Another reading]: It is the image of the eye (ir.t) of Re [in] the morning at his daily birth.
Now for Mehweret, she is the Udjat 83 of Re.
Standing behind the cow is an unidentifiable goddess whose head is an Udjat-eye, and who is holding a lotus blossom, again the symbol of rebirth. 84
In relation to these characters, Joseph speaks of a governing planet receiving light though a medium of governing power. No particular nexus, however, between the symbolism of the powers of nature or the primeval waters and that governing
readily commends itself.
6. These four standing mummiform figures are the four Sons of Horus, Imst (or Msti, with a man's head), H3py (with an ape's head),
Dw3-mw.t.f (with a jackal's head), and Kbh-snw.f (with a hawk's head). They were the gods of the four quarters of the earth, and later came to be regarded as presiding over the four cardinal points. 85 They also were
guardians of the viscera of the dead, and their images were carved on the four canopic jars into which the internal organs were placed.
Joseph Smith simply states, "Represents this earth in its four quarters."
Behind the four standing figures is a lotus blossom, a lion, and a sheep. This is the hieroglyphic name of one of the strange gods of chapter 162 of the Book of the Dead 86 which is tentatively rendered
Sr.t-miw-sriw. Just what god is meant is not known.
7. A seated ithyphallic god with a hawk's tail, holding aloft the divine flail. Several gods of similar appearance are found on the Metternich Stela mentioned above. 87 Before him is what
appears to be a bird of some sort, presenting him with an Udjat-eye. In most other hypocephali it is a snake or an ape that is presenting the eye, but often this snake seems to have a hawk's head. This snake is thought to
be Nehebka, a snake god and one of the assessors in the 125th chapter of the Book of the Dead. 88 Nehebka was considered to be a provider of nourishment, and as such was often shown presenting a
pair of jars or the Udjat-eye, the symbol of good gifts. 89 As for the bird found in Facsimile 2, this symbolize the Ba (which is often represented as a bird by the Egyptians) presenting the Udjat-eye to the seated god.
The seated god is clearly a form of Min, the god of the regenerative, procreative forces of nature, perhaps combined with Horus as the hawk's tail would seem to indicate. 90
Joseph Smith mentions here the Holy Ghost in the form of a dove and God "revealing through the heavens the grand key-words of the priesthood." The procreative forces, receiving unusual accentuating throughout the representation, may
stand for many divine generative powers, not least of which might be conjoined with the blessings of the priesthood in one's posterity eternally.
Taken as a whole, the figures and illustrations of the hypocephalus all seem to point toward the Egyptians' hope in a resurrection and life after death. Although this message seems to be conveyed by a strange assortment of gods, animals and
mixtures of both, it is well to remember that to the Egyptians these were all aspects of the One God who manifested himself in many forms. 91
Conclusion
Although we can, with the help of other similar texts, reconstruct the text and figures of the Joseph Smith Hypocephalus with a fair degree of accuracy, we are still far from completely understanding the message which the Egyptians meant to
convey by it. The text of the hypocephalus itself seems to be an address to Osiris, the god of the Dead, on behalf of the deceased, Sheshonk. As is the case with most Egyptian text (especially
religious text), it is full of references to matters either obscure or unknown to us, although undoubtedly clear to the Egyptians. Needless to say, much work is still to be done before we can fully understand the import of the Joseph Smith
Hypocephalus, and hypocephali in general. Unfortunately, there has been little or no work done on them since the end of the last century. I hope, however, that I have been able to contribute to our knowledge of this interesting group of texts.